Anti-Semitism in the Labour Party?


Recently there have been recurring accusations of anti-semitism within the British Labour party. These accusations are spurious; that’s not to say that anti-semitism does not exist on the left at all, but the real source of racism and anti-semitism in Britain today is from the right, enhanced by the scurrilous anti-immigrant Brexit campaign.

In the US, there has been a spike in the number of anti-semitic messages on Twitter, directed especially against Jewish journalists, encouraged by Trump’s racist campaign. The Anti-Defamation League found that more than 800 journalists had been the subject of anti-semitic attacks, mainly from Trump supporters; Trump’s final election ad was grossly anti-semitic.

There is no question that the Jewish community is right to be concerned about the growth of rightwing movements in Europe who spout racism in more or less veiled forms.

Jewish communities have an emotional connection with Israel as part of their sense of identity, which has strengthened as identity politics became more pronounced in the postmodern era. However, the rightwing Israeli Likud government has taken advantage of this sentiment to exert political pressure on governments in its own interests. Most Jewish communities in the US are liberal politically, but the rightwing AIPAC has established an outsized influence on foreign policy.

This is facilitated by an ideological positioning of Jewish experience as exceptional, privileging their persecution in Europe – which has the effect of divorcing Jewish struggles from other oppressed groups with which they have often identified historically.

It is also cynically exploited by the British political establishment to attack the credibility of Jeremy Corbyn and his supporters. But where were they when Ed Miliband faced the dog-whistle anti-semitism of the Daily Mail and the Sun in 2015? Instead of defending him, the Jewish leadership in Britain attacked him for his principled defence of Palestinian rights.

Today the accusations of anti-semitism have been seized on by the Tories and PLP Blairites to attack the Labour party left and Momentum. Jim Cook contributes a guest editorial analyzing the conflation of anti-semitism with criticisms of the Israeli state.

During the middle ages the Ottoman Empire was seen as, and became, a place of refuge for Jews from Europe. I read many years ago of an English aristocrat who went, as tourist or diplomat, to the ‘Sublime Porte,’ the seat of government of the Empire and found, to his horror, that he, like all Christians, was rated as being at the same level as Jews. Jews lived quite comfortably, albeit like Christians as second class citizens, all over north Africa and through the Middle East including in Palestine and with even a few thousand in Jerusalem.

What changed all this was of course the betrayal of the Arabs by the British and French at the end of WWI. The British, Lawrence of Arabia for one, promised Arabs their freedom from the Ottoman Empire while the Turks tried to enlist Muslim solidarity. At the end of the war the British and the French reneged on any promises made to Arabs and, treating them with their accustomed imperial disdain, proceeded to carve up the Middle East in their own interests – albeit with the need to allow for some local interests to avoid continuous all-out war.

Concurrent with that was the 1917 Balfour Declaration that, “His Majesty’s government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”

The “civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities” meant about as much then as the rights of indigenous people in America, Australia, Asia and Africa, that is not very much. Jews bought up land in Palestine from absentee landlords and set about populating it with Jews and driving peasant families from their ancient homes. This, not surprisingly, led to increasing opposition from Palestinians who for some reason did not see their homeland as “A land without a people for a people without a land” – originally a Christian phrase for a way of getting rid of Jews – from Europe.

The Palestinian people have fought the invasion of European settlers for at least a century with loss of life on both sides, though increasingly more Arab lives lost than Jewish. In the course of this struggle Muslims worldwide have, not surprisingly, tended to support the Palestinian side. They too have experienced European, including via the USA, disdain, exploitation, humiliation, occupation and murder: things they can clearly see in Palestine/Israel. Many Muslims have continued to experience at least some of those injuries even after moving to Europe, or the USA.

It is a pity that some Muslims have picked up on European anti-Semitic tropes, perhaps on the basis of ‘my enemy’s enemy is my friend’. This is counter-productive to the Palestinian cause as it gives the Israeli government yet another stick to beat them with. It can also tend to alienate the many Jews worldwide who support the Palestinians in their struggle and also maintain a long tradition of liberal and socialist principle, not least during the height of the Civil Rights movement of the US.

But the bar is set exceptionally low for someone to be charged with anti-Semitism. When Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party was accused of such anti-Semitism there were letters to the Guardian that said that opposition to Zionism was not anti-Semitism, Zionism is a political position not an attribute of Jewish identity. I fully agreed, and agree, with that. But I also started looking at the Jewish Chronicle (JC) to see what attitudes there were. I was a bit surprised to find that, yes, some Jews think that Zionism and support for the state of Israel are part of being a Jew.

For instance: Yehuda Bauer, professor of Holocaust Studies at Hebrew University, is quoted in JC September 7 2016 as saying: “Anti-Zionism is a slogan, there’s nothing real behind it. It’s anti-Jewish, it’s antisemitic.”

Melanie Phillips, JC September 29 2016 says in “My letter to the Prime Minister,” “The animus against Israel cannot be separated from hostility to Jews. Antisemitism singles out Jews for treatment applied to no other people: double standards, imputation of conspiratorial powers and false claims they are committing crimes of which they are in fact the victims. This is precisely the treatment applied to Israel.”

Josh Jackman in JC October 10 2016: “The Board of Deputies has condemned a planned event by a pro-Palestinian student group which aims to separate anti-Zionism from antisemitism.” And further, he quotes Marie van der Zyl, Board vice-president who claims: “For the vast majority of British Jews, political, cultural and religious affiliation with the state of Israel is a fundamental part of their Jewish identity.”

So Zionism is just another name for Judaism? And so anti-Zionism is just another name for anti-Semitism? This is nonsense. Zionism is, now at least, the assertion that Jews are entitled to take and live in the lands previously known as Palestine. It is a political assertion and as such these is no reason whatsoever why it should not be opposed without the opposition being labelled as effectively ‘immoral’, not wrong but morally wrong and basically disgusting. Anti-Semitism in itself is a form of racism and so, yes, immoral, disgusting, stupid and ignorant.

And now we have the report of the Home Affairs Committee “Antisemitism inquiry” which, according to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz (October 16 2016): “Important is the committee’s valiant attempt to define what can be constituted as anti-Semitism in modern Britain, and by extension, in Western political discourse. “The report states what should be obvious but sadly is not – that the starting point for any discussion on anti-Semitism should be what the Jewish community and Jews themselves feel is anti-Semitic.”

Zionism was never a part of being a Jew. By some accounts it originated in European ‘Christian’ circles when all sorts of nationalisms were springing up. Jews could be “subjects” just like Protestants, Catholics and even Muslims but “citizens”? So some 19th century Protestants thought it would be a good idea to encourage Jews to go to “the Holy Land”, this would not only get rid of the Jews but also accomplish the divine plan of gathering Jews together in anticipation of Armageddon and the return of the messiah – a belief still held by hordes of American Christians to this day.

There can be lots of reasons why such a call for a ‘homeland’ might be opposed politically but that opposition cannot be defined in itself as ‘racist’ and neither can political opposition to Zionism be called anti-Semitic. Anti-Zionism is not part of the “racist” family but more like part of the ideological or political family that would include “Un-American”.

The main claim to Israel’s moral authority is of course the Holocaust: nothing else could even come close to excusing the crimes committed against the Palestinian people. But even the Holocaust grants no special privilege to Jews, Zionists or the state of Israel: how could massive hurt grant the right to hurt others?  It could perhaps justify a Jewish state in Germany but whatever the Mufti of Jerusalem may or may not have done in WWII the Palestinians were not responsible for the Holocaust. Even some of the survivors, not that there are many left now, were opposed to the use of the suffering of themselves and their fellows for narrow political ends.

There are Jews who are anti-Zionist: some of the most orthodox see the return by force of arms, rather than with the messiah, as blasphemy. But the most eloquent opponents of the Israeli state and of Zionism, in the English language anyway, are Israeli and American Jews. They are clearly not anti-Semitic so they have earned the even more ridiculous label of “self-hating Jews” – itself an anti-Semitic jibe. I must admit that in my reading about the Holocaust, Israel, Palestine and American politics, in books by respected Jewish and non-Jewish, Zionist and non-Zionist, historians and other commentators, I’ve come across several “self-hating Jews” and I can only admire their courage.

So what’s this ‘anti-Semitism in the Labour Party all about? Ken Livingstone is quoted by Lianne Kolirin, JC 5 September 2016, as saying on a radio breakfast show, “The simple fact is that until they started to undermine Jeremy, no Labour MP in my lifetime had ever said there was any issue of antisemitism in the Labour Party.”

Despite being the only nuclear power in the region, having the most effective armed forces in the region and having the world’s ‘super-power’ covering their back – and giving them lots of money to buy arms – it seems that Israel is facing an existential threat due to BDS. A Republican Congressman, Doug Lamborn, claimed in a phone call to the Jerusalem post that BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) is “the re-emergence of the scourge of anti-Semitism. It is the same hatred just put into new clothing”.

The Israeli political elite is afraid of what they call “delegitimation;” the main thrust of that internationally is the BDS movement and they are afraid that the Labour Party, under Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership, might move from under the US foreign policy umbrella into support for the rights of Palestinians. Hence all this “anti-Semitism in the Labour Party” nonsense. The real movement of socialists, and many liberals, worldwide is for the state of Israel and its Zionist supporters to treat Palestinians as fellow human beings.

But the rulers, and the bulk of the inhabitants, of Israel are not Holocaust survivors. Many of them come from the United States and Europe and share the imperialist disdain for “the natives” that so many from the United States and Europe have held for centuries. They need, for their own long term safety and for the sake of common decency to work for a resolution of their differences with Palestinians – but there is little ground for optimism in this regard at the moment.

The Zionists feel that Israel is the natural “home” of the Jewish people everywhere, but the question must be asked, “What about the Palestinians?” And the answer of the state of Israel, the Zionists and the right wing Christian nutters in the US is, “What about the Palestinians?” And these racists have the nerve to call us anti-Semites.

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under anti-semitism, British Labour party, Israel, Jeremy Corbyn, labour mp's, Labour Party, Uncategorized

2 responses to “Anti-Semitism in the Labour Party?

  1. tompainesghost

    JIm,

    Reading your document spurred me on to put down on paper something I’ve been thinking and saying for some time. While any form of racism is vile and must be opposed, I really think that Corbyn made a big mistake in the way he handled the accusations of anti-semitism in the Labour Party.
    – Carmel

    I was born into a Jewish family and my grandparents had come to England in a desperate attempt to escape the anti-semitism and progroms of eastern Europe in the early 1900s. My parents, both born in this country, were ardent Zionists in their youth. When I was born I was given my name, Carmel, after Mount Carmel, the first thing you see as you sail into Haifa harbour. I still remember as a child being horrified to see my Russian grandfather weeping because, shortly after the Second World War ended, he had received news that his entire family had been massacred during the Nazi invasion of that part of Russia.
    So it was no wonder that, growing up as a child, I was overcome with emotion when the State of Israel was established. We were told that a people without land had come home to a land without people. It never occurred to me at that age that there were, indeed, people there. I had plans that when I left school I would go to Israel and help build the Promised Land. It was not long, however, that news began to filter out that things were not all that they seemed.
    In fact, even my father, who had been such an ardent Zionist in his youth, began to question what was going on. He would watch the news on the television and fume, “Look what those bastards are doing now!” – the bastards he was referring to were not the Arabs, but the Israeli government which was forcibly throwing people off their lands and taking it for themselves.
    One of the political questions which has not been addressed, it seems to me, is the actual setting up of the Zionist state itself. The fact is that the 1939-45 war had spurred on the development of nationalism in many of the countries that had been under western domination beforehand. In India the movement led by Nehru, for example, led eventually to Indian independence. The same thing was happening in the Middle East. The growth of nationalism amongst the Arabs there threatened the western hold over the Suez Canal, at that time, so important for the movement of shipping (in fact, when Nasser in Egypt tried to nationalise the Canal in 1956 it actually led to war with Britain and France). It also threatened western control of the oil fields.
    At the same time, hundreds of Jews were being liberated from the concentration camps. Unable to return to their homes, many of them were put into Displaced Persons’ Camps, where they continued to live behind barbed wire, some for years. Many western countries, including Britain and America, put blocks on large-scale immigration from the DP Camps into their countries. They certainly did not want to have to deal with hundreds of sick and traumatised people, no matter what they had been through. That left many of the surviving Jews with little alternative but to emigrate to Palestine, something which was encouraged and largely organised by the Zionist movement.
    It suited the west as a whole, in fact, to have a Jewish state set up in the Middle East which would not only take the Holocaust survivors they did not want to have to deal with, but also act as a bulwark against the growth of Arab nationalisation. In that sense, Israel is not only a product of Zionism, but also of western interests. No wonder they support it, in spite of everything.
    Just as anti-Zionism and every form of racism is encouraged and used by various ruling elites to mask the real perpetrators of injustice, there are also Jews who realise that the actions of the Israeli state towards the Palestinians is also vile and racist.
    Rather than just set up an investigation into anti-semitism within the Labour Party, I think Jeremy Corbyn would have done much better to call on the assistance of organisations such as Jews for Justice for Palestine to explain their position as proud Jews who oppose the actions of the Israeli government. This would not only have weakened the opposition of the Zionists who claim to speak for all Jews, but also shown a wider audience that there are many Jews who oppose the actions of Israel and support the Palestinians in their struggle for their rights.

  2. tompainesghost

    Very good, Jim. I’ve been reading “Politically Incorrect — Why a Jewish state is a bad idea” by Ofra Yeshua-Lyth and thoroughly recommend it. I was particularly upset by Howard Jacobson’s article last month in The Observer (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/22/be-clear-antisemitism-is-a-hate-apart) and was moved to send the following letter to the paper, which of course didn’t publish it. – John Spencer

    Let’s be clear – Israel, if we’re talking about the state of that name – has no more right to exist than any other state, which is to say no right at all. How could such a right be squared with the state’s oft-exercised right to wage war, given that a state with a “right to exist” could never legitimately be defeated? Those at war with the self-righteous state might have something to say about that.
    States come and states go: since the revolution, France has had a republic, an empire, another republic, a second empire, a third republic, an etat, a fourth republic and is now on its fifth. The fate of former European states, including Aragon, Etruria, the Kingdom of the Two Burgundies, Sabaudia and Galicia, is brilliantly chronicled in Norman Davies Vanished Kingdoms (Allen Lane, 2011). Rhodesia and apartheid South Africa disappeared in our lifetime as did the German Democratic Republic, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union, though that Stalinist Hebrew utopia, Birobidzhan, survives. Our own state, the United Kingdom, began to disintegrate in 1922 and would have come to an end last year had the Scots voted for independence.
    If Israel is a state like any other, it takes its chances with the other states on the planet. Zionism’s champions deliberately conflate the right of their state with the right to exist of Jews, with Israel as its supposed guarantor. Extermination of Jews ended through the destruction of the 1,000-year Reich three years before Israel came into existence.
    The propaganda barrage about Israel’s rights conceals the rights that really are at issue, those of Palestinians betrayed by the Balfour declaration 99 years ago, denied self-determination by the British mandate authorities, and in a majority of cases since forcibly excluded from their homeland. As long ago as 1948 the UN called for the return of Palestinian refugees, whose rights Israel has consistently ignored. The Israeli state swallowed up East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights and has maintained Palestinian territory under occupation for nearly sixty years.
    The demand that Palestinian negotiators must as a precondition accept their enemy’s “right to exist”, since embroidered into a “right to exist as a Jewish state”, was crafted by the Israeli government so that no self-respecting Palestinian could possibly agree. Having thus helped to stave off a two-state “solution” which Israel never sincerely sought, the slogan has since been weaponised against Israel’s critics, branding them as antisemites.
    Some Labour MPs, including former full-time Israeli propagandists, fear probably rightly that under Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership the party will no longer be their secure roosting place. For her admirably straightforward and sensible report on antisemitism in the Labour Party, they have the gall to slander Shami Chakrabarti as a place-seeker trading her immense reputation for a paltry seat in the House of Lords. As if.
    Howard Jacobson (Let’s be clear – antisemitism is a hate apart, The Observer, 23 October 2016), who appears to speak for “the Jews”, may not recognise the occupation as conquest or perceive colonial expansion in the steady spread of Jewish settlements on occupied land, but the dispossessed show no sign of forgetting or accepting their dispossession.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s